The application of the Brussels I Recast Regulation to wrongful activities online and the delict oriented approach
The Internet has a global reach and the activities carried out there often have a transnational nature. In cases where the transnational activity has an unlawful nature, it is necessary to determine which court has jurisdiction to decide compensation for damage arising from such unlawful activity and to that end it is necessary to resort to Regulation No 1215/2012, of 12 December 2012, on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters (Brussels I Regulation (recast)). The Regulation has special jurisdiction rules applicable to matters relating to torts, delict or quasi-delict (Article 7(2)) which gives jurisdiction to the court of the Member State where the harmful event occurred or may occur. However, taking into account the specific characteristics of the internet and its global nature, it is not easy to establish the place where harmful event occurs when the wrongful activity takes place online. The features of the internet require an adaptation of the interpretation of the traditional jurisdiction rule of Article 7(2), which has a territorial nature, in a way that it is possible to apply this provision to internet activities. This effort of interpretation is the aim of this study.
EJLT is an open access journal, aiming to disseminate academic work and perspectives as widely as possible to the benefit of the author and the author’s readers. It is the assumption of the EJLT that authors who publish in the journal wish their work to be available as freely and as widely as possible through the open access publishing channel.
Authors who publish with EJLT will retain copyright and moral rights in the underlying work but will grant all users the rights to copy, store and print for non-commercial use copies of their work. Commercial mirroring may also be carried out with the consent of the journal. The work must remain as published – without redaction or editing – and must clearly state the identity of the author and the originating EJLT url of the article. Any commercial use of the author’s work - apart from mirroring - requires the permission of the author and any aspects of the article which are the property of EJLT (e.g. typographical format) requires permission from EJLT.
Authors can sometimes become no longer contactable (through, for example, death or retirement). If this occurs, any rights in the work will pass to the European Journal of Law and Technology which will continue to make the work available in as wide a manner as possible to achieve the aims of open access and ensuring that an author's work continues to be available. An author - or their estate - can recover these rights from EJLT by providing contact information.
The European Journal of Law and Technology holds rights in format, publication and dissemination.
EJLT, as a non-commercial organisation - which receives donations to allow it to continue publishing – must retain information on reader access to journal articles. This means that we will not give permission to mirror the journal unless we can be provided with full details as to reader access to each and every journal article. We prefer and encourage deep linking rather than mirroring. Encouragement is thus given for all users – commercial and non-commercial – to provide indexes and links to articles in the EJLT where the index or link points to the location of the article on the EJLT server, rather than to stored copies on other servers.
Please contact the European Journal of Law and Technology if you are in any doubt as to what this statement of use covers.