Digital Rights Management and Fair Dealing
AbstractThe recent controversies surrounding Amazon’s removal of George Orwell’s ‘1984’ from Kindle readers , the BBC’s proposal to encrypt Freeview High Definition (HD) content and Microsoft’s permanent ban on Xbox Live users who have modified or ‘chipped’ their consoles have all served to highlight the debate over Digital Rights Management (DRM) and digital copyright. In particular, these incidents highlight the emerging and novel possibility of ‘remote’ content management resulting from an arbitrary decision made by the relevant rights holder(s). The blocking of content to users in particular raises important tensions between DRM and the defences under the fair use/fair dealing doctrine of copyright law which enables users to make use of copyrighted content for certain purposes. The very goal of copyright law, and the fair dealing doctrine contained therein, is the advancement of knowledge and the creation of new works. Copyright’s exclusive rights facilitate this by providing incentives to create, while fair dealing allows users to engage with creative content; thus forming the basis for inspiration and creation of new works. As such, this amounts to recognition of the role existing works play in the creation of new content. However, these divergent interests have been exacerbated by digital technology. The issue of whether DRM is an appropriate method for regulating digital copyright is open to debate. Indeed, when the idea that ‘the answer to the machine is the machine’ was proposed in 1995 , it is questionable whether such prevention of access and use was envisaged. The fair use/dealing doctrine has been crucial in mediating the tension between copyright law and technology , and has an inherent degree of flexibility in its application. Arguably, with DRM, there is no such flexibility and there exists an inherent conflict between the vagueness of the doctrine and the precise nature of the technological code required for DRMs implementation. The aim of this paper is to outline a coherent definition of DRM and provide a brief background of its legislative history and content. Following from this, the doctrine will be analysed in the context of DRM in order to examine whether such defences can continue to operate; specifically regarding the seemingly irreconcilable differences between the inherent nature of the legal doctrine and the technological (and legal) code of DRM.
EJLT is an open access journal, aiming to disseminate academic work and perspectives as widely as possible to the benefit of the author and the author’s readers. It is the assumption of the EJLT that authors who publish in the journal wish their work to be available as freely and as widely as possible through the open access publishing channel.
Authors who publish with EJLT will retain copyright and moral rights in the underlying work but will grant all users the rights to copy, store and print for non-commercial use copies of their work. Commercial mirroring may also be carried out with the consent of the journal. The work must remain as published – without redaction or editing – and must clearly state the identity of the author and the originating EJLT url of the article. Any commercial use of the author’s work - apart from mirroring - requires the permission of the author and any aspects of the article which are the property of EJLT (e.g. typographical format) requires permission from EJLT.
Authors can sometimes become no longer contactable (through, for example, death or retirement). If this occurs, any rights in the work will pass to the European Journal of Law and Technology which will continue to make the work available in as wide a manner as possible to achieve the aims of open access and ensuring that an author's work continues to be available. An author - or their estate - can recover these rights from EJLT by providing contact information.
The European Journal of Law and Technology holds rights in format, publication and dissemination.
EJLT, as a non-commercial organisation - which receives donations to allow it to continue publishing – must retain information on reader access to journal articles. This means that we will not give permission to mirror the journal unless we can be provided with full details as to reader access to each and every journal article. We prefer and encourage deep linking rather than mirroring. Encouragement is thus given for all users – commercial and non-commercial – to provide indexes and links to articles in the EJLT where the index or link points to the location of the article on the EJLT server, rather than to stored copies on other servers.
Please contact the European Journal of Law and Technology if you are in any doubt as to what this statement of use covers.