Participatory democracy and information and communications technology: A legal pluralist perspective

Authors

  • Michael Anthony C. Dizon Baker & McKenzie

Abstract

This article explains why democracy and the important process of democratisation include but go beyond the ambit of the state and state laws, and how democracy and democratisation are both negotiated, contested, engaged with and made up by diverse state and non-state actors within plural legal orders and across multiple sites and transnational networks. This article aims to re-imagine the conception of democracy vis-à-vis information and communications technology from the perspectives of demo-diversity and legal pluralism. Furthermore, the author discusses why the transnational anti-DRM campaign is a successful example of democratisation in the digital networked environment.

Author Biography

Michael Anthony C. Dizon, Baker & McKenzie

*AB (Ateneo de Manila University), LLB (University of the Philippines), LLM with Distinction (University of Edinburgh). He is currently a Professional Support Lawyer with Baker & McKenzie's Global Information Technology & Communications Group. The views expressed in this article are the author's own and do not reflect those of his employer or the organisations with which he is connected.

Published

2010-12-02

Issue

Vol. 1 No. 3 (2010)

Section

Refereed Articles

EJLT is an open access journal, aiming to disseminate academic work and perspectives as widely as possible to the benefit of the author and the author’s readers.  It is the assumption of the EJLT that authors who publish in the journal wish their work to be available as freely and as widely as possible through the open access publishing channel.

Authors who publish with EJLT will retain copyright and moral rights in the underlying work but will grant all users the rights to copy, store and print for non-commercial use copies of their work. Commercial mirroring may also be carried out with the consent of the journal. The work must remain as published – without redaction or editing – and must clearly state the identity of the author and the originating EJLT url of the article.  Any commercial use of the author’s work - apart from mirroring - requires the permission of the author and any aspects of the article which are the property of EJLT (e.g. typographical format) requires permission from EJLT.

Authors can sometimes become no longer contactable (through, for example, death or retirement).  If this occurs, any rights in the work will pass to the European Journal of Law and Technology which will continue to make the work available in as wide a manner as possible to achieve the aims of open access and ensuring that an author's work continues to be available.  An author - or their estate - can recover these rights from EJLT by providing contact information.

The European Journal of Law and Technology holds rights in format, publication and dissemination.
 
EJLT, as a non-commercial organisation - which receives donations to allow it to continue publishing – must retain information on reader access to journal articles. This means that we will not give permission to mirror the journal unless we can be provided with full details as to reader access to each and every journal article.  We prefer and encourage deep linking rather than mirroring.  Encouragement is thus given for all users – commercial and non-commercial – to provide indexes and links to articles in the EJLT where the index or link points to the location of the article on the EJLT server, rather than to stored copies on other servers.

Please contact the European Journal of Law and Technology if you are in any doubt as to what this statement of use covers.