Information and Intermediation, Abuse of Dominance and Internet ‘Neutrality’: ‘Updating’ Competition Policy under the Digital Single Market and the Google Investigations(?)
Abstract
The focus of the present article is on the issue of information and information intermediation in the internet environment, and its implications for competition policy. The analysis concentrates on the value and necessity of information in the internet-marketplace and on the position, use, and involvement of internet intermediaries in conduct which concerns the availability, manipulation, and diffusion of that information. This discussion is triggered by, and thereby concentrates upon, the EU Commission’s Communication on the Digital Single Market and the recent Google investigations. Inevitably, the direction taken focuses on the principle of ‘net neutrality’ (as encompassed in the Communication), as this arguably appears to emerge (and gradually becoming incorporated) in the area of European competition policy for the internet and the associated issues of freedom and availability of information. The main argument advanced is that given this opportunity for attaining the ‘Digital Single Market’ and in light of the Google investigations, the Commission could appear to be ‘updating’ its analysis in its proposed agenda, evolving into an ‘update’ of competition policy particularly for the internet environment, that focuses on information and its ‘neutral’ treatment.
Published
Issue
Section
EJLT is an open access journal, aiming to disseminate academic work and perspectives as widely as possible to the benefit of the author and the author’s readers. It is the assumption of the EJLT that authors who publish in the journal wish their work to be available as freely and as widely as possible through the open access publishing channel.
Authors who publish with EJLT will retain copyright and moral rights in the underlying work but will grant all users the rights to copy, store and print for non-commercial use copies of their work. Commercial mirroring may also be carried out with the consent of the journal. The work must remain as published – without redaction or editing – and must clearly state the identity of the author and the originating EJLT url of the article. Any commercial use of the author’s work - apart from mirroring - requires the permission of the author and any aspects of the article which are the property of EJLT (e.g. typographical format) requires permission from EJLT.
Authors can sometimes become no longer contactable (through, for example, death or retirement). If this occurs, any rights in the work will pass to the European Journal of Law and Technology which will continue to make the work available in as wide a manner as possible to achieve the aims of open access and ensuring that an author's work continues to be available. An author - or their estate - can recover these rights from EJLT by providing contact information.
The European Journal of Law and Technology holds rights in format, publication and dissemination.
EJLT, as a non-commercial organisation - which receives donations to allow it to continue publishing – must retain information on reader access to journal articles. This means that we will not give permission to mirror the journal unless we can be provided with full details as to reader access to each and every journal article. We prefer and encourage deep linking rather than mirroring. Encouragement is thus given for all users – commercial and non-commercial – to provide indexes and links to articles in the EJLT where the index or link points to the location of the article on the EJLT server, rather than to stored copies on other servers.
Please contact the European Journal of Law and Technology if you are in any doubt as to what this statement of use covers.